FanBell: this scan vs. the previous one
260905-fanbell-link-fd10 (2026-09-05 22:40:39) → 260906-retest-9b00bc (2026-09-06 08:27:48)
No change was detected: 2 of 39 questions gained the majority verdict and 3 lost it (exact McNemar p = 1.00; -3 points, question-resampling sensitivity range -13 to +8 points). This is not the same as showing that no change occurred; this scan may miss small or inconsistent movements. With 39 matched questions, this comparison has limited power and is mainly able to detect large, directionally consistent changes. Under the planning assumptions used here — 80% power, a two-sided 5% test and an assumed 20% of questions disagreeing between the two scans — a change of about 20 points has about 80% power in one primary comparison. This is not a cutoff: smaller changes can sometimes be detected, and larger changes are not guaranteed to be detected.
The verdict is an exact McNemar test on the 39 question(s) both scans asked, comparing each question's majority verdict — not the rates, and not the flip counts below. A permutation test over the graded per-question fractions gives p = 1.000. This result was adjusted with 1 per-engine comparison, for 2 comparisons total, using Benjamini–Hochberg; q = 1.000.
| Not recommended now | Recommended now | |
|---|---|---|
| Not recommended before | 24 | 2 |
| Recommended before | 3 | 10 |
Only the two disagreeing cells carry information: 3 question(s) lost the majority verdict, 2 gained it — exact McNemar p = 1.000 (mid-p 0.688). Effect -3 points, question-resampling sensitivity range -13 to +8 points, over questions.
The primary comparison specified in the current method version is an exact two-sided McNemar test on matched question-level majority verdicts. α = 0.05, Benjamini–Hochberg across 2 comparison(s). Every range here is a question-resampling sensitivity range: resampling which of the frozen questions you look at moves the answer by this much. It is not a calibrated re-test range and not a market confidence interval, and the bootstrap’s own simulated coverage across the designs we ship (scripts/ci_coverage_sim.py) runs 0.90–1.00, so no 95% level is claimed for it.
A detected change does not show what caused it: your site may be unchanged while models, indexes, retrieval systems or other external conditions move. This is measurement evidence, not attribution.
By engine, each corrected in the same family (the engines are separate populations): OpenAI no change detected — 2 gained / 3 lost of 39, p = 1.000.
lost / gained the majority verdict — the same 3 losses and 2 gains the test above is computed on. Descriptive instability model: this same scan pair estimates that 15% of the matched questions are unstable. Under that fitted model, about 0.7 losses and 0.7 gains are expected; this is not an independent noise baseline or a calibrated test.
The list below shows the questions that crossed the question-level majority-verdict threshold. These are the same 3 losses and 2 gains used in the McNemar table above. It describes what moved; it is not itself the test, which is why the verdict above is a paired McNemar test instead. Both rate ranges are computed over questions, not samples: exact McNemar p = 1.000: 3 question(s) lost the majority verdict and 2 gained it, which is what movement in either direction alone produces; the two question-resampling sensitivity ranges overlap, so the rates alone are not distinguishable.
Per-question majority-verdict changes (5 of 39 comparable questions)
| Change | Question | Before | After |
|---|---|---|---|
| lost | What is the easiest way for fans to send tips or thank-you payments to creators? | 2/3 | 0/3 |
| won | Which platforms are best for selling custom services like profile reviews or content feedback to fans? | 0/3 | 3/3 |
| won | How can I collect tips from fans directly through my link-in-bio? | 0/3 | 2/3 |
| lost | Is Beacons a good value for creators looking to offer paid fan interactions? | 2/3 | 0/3 |
| lost | Is Stan Store worth it for creators focused on paid fan engagement? | 3/3 | 1/3 |
Reachability changes
No engine's reachability verdict changed.
Who gets recommended — what changed
| Brand | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy Me a Coffee | 12% | 16% | +4pt |
| Ko-fi | 26% | 23% | -3pt |
| Stan Store | 20% | 18% | -2pt |
| Gumroad | 2% | 1% | -1pt |
| ChatBlue | 1% | 0% | -1pt |
| Pucker | 1% | 0% | -1pt |
| Fanvue | 0% | 1% | +1pt |
| Liberapay | 1% | 0% | -1pt |
| HerFans | 1% | 0% | -1pt |
| OnlyFans | 0% | 1% | +1pt |
| XOXO Fan | 1% | 0% | -1pt |
| Payhip | 1% | 0% | -1pt |
The primary comparison specified in the current method version is an exact two-sided McNemar test on matched question-level majority verdicts. The raw recommended share is descriptive and no verdict is read from it: these two readings are described, not tested.
Source ledger diff
Newly cited (20): https://fansriver.com, https://soc.bio/best-link-in-bio-tools, https://www.everybodyugc.com, https://www.auxchord.app, https://appadvice.com/app/khloe-official-app/1458084498, https://alua.com, https://comparecamp.com/playvox-review-pricing-pros-cons-fea, https://customsflow.io, https://fourthwall.com/features/direct-messages, https://wishprime.com, https://intelinet.mx/aplicaciones, https://maddyoutdoors.mykajabi.com/blog/top-10-ugc-job-platf, https://www.dm2.chat, https://allcreatortools.com/tools/lnk_bio, https://ok.ru/video/7314703714904, https://www.embold.co/ugc, https://www.woshipm.com/ai/6337705.html, https://1link.jp/rule, https://aiinfluencerslaunch.com/fanvue-vs-onlyfans, https://alua.com/android
No longer cited (20): https://www.fansriver.com, https://www.icanlearn.com/talkio-ai, https://auxchord.app, https://everybodyugc.com, https://www.135editor.com/essences/7936.html, https://www.ddooo.com/softdown/59508.htm, https://www.linkinbio.com/tools, https://www.tecmundo.com.br/internet/266567-fanfever-conheca, https://www.linkinbio.com/blog/best-link-in-bio-tools, https://backstage.slipmat.io/t/which-dj-vj-pool-do-you-use/1, https://fanbell.link/resources/best-paid-qa-platforms-for-cr, https://getseedr.com, https://info.solerpalau.com/en/enginair, https://linqhive.com, https://my2centz.com, https://talkvialink.com, https://uxerwave.com/social-media/best-link-in-bio-tools, https://wisepim.com/features/product-families, https://wishof.me/en-us, https://www.appvizer.co.uk/customer/call-centre/dialfire
Newly naming the brand (0): none