Medium vs LinkedIn vs Substack for Publishing AEO Content
Medium, LinkedIn and Substack can each extend your content into AI answers, but in different ways, and none should replace your own site. LinkedIn is the most cited of the three. Semrush found it among the five most cited domains in ChatGPT, Google's AI Mode and Perplexity. Its robots.txt lets OpenAI's and Anthropic's search crawlers read public posts and articles, but it blocks their live fetchers and Perplexity's crawlers. Medium welcomes AI search crawlers but blocks training crawlers, and its import tool keeps your site as the canonical source. Substack is open to crawlers, works well on a custom domain, and offers an opt-out from AI training. Publish the full version on your own site first, then adapt it for your audience's platform and link back.
How do AI engines treat each platform?
| Question | Medium | Substack | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI's search crawler (OAI-SearchBot) | Allowed on public posts and articles; some paths blocked | Allowed | Allowed |
| ChatGPT's live fetcher (ChatGPT-User) | Blocked | Allowed | Allowed |
| Anthropic's search crawler (Claude-SearchBot) | Allowed on public posts and articles; some paths blocked | Allowed | Allowed |
| Claude's live fetcher (Claude-User) | Blocked | Allowed | Allowed |
| Perplexity's crawlers | Blocked | Allowed | Allowed |
| Training crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot) | Blocked | Blocked | Allowed by default; writers can opt out |
| Google-Extended (Gemini) | Blocked | Allowed | Allowed |
| Your own domain | No | Custom domains for publications | Custom domains available |
| Canonical back to your site | No | Yes, through its import tool | Only if you host on your own domain |
The table reflects each platform's robots.txt in September 2026. Such files change, so check them before planning around them.
What it means in practice: LinkedIn content can appear in ChatGPT and Claude search answers from their indexes, and in Google's AI Overviews through Googlebot. LinkedIn's robots.txt also disallows ChatGPT's and Claude's live fetchers and Perplexity's crawlers. Claude and Perplexity's index crawler honour that; OpenAI says robots.txt may not apply to user-initiated ChatGPT fetches, but LinkedIn's login wall often blocks them anyway, so do not rely on a pasted LinkedIn link being read. Medium and Substack are readable by all the main AI search systems.
Why does LinkedIn get cited so much?
LinkedIn posts and articles are written by named people with visible roles and companies, on professional topics, and they are updated constantly. For business questions, such as "how do finance teams handle X?" or "what do HR leaders think about Y?", they supply first-hand views that assistants can attribute. Semrush's 2025 analysis found Google's AI Mode cited LinkedIn in nearly 15% of responses. Why this sometimes means a post is cited instead of your product page is covered in why LLMs cite LinkedIn posts instead of product pages.
Its limits: no canonical link to your site, the platform owns the presentation, and ChatGPT's and Claude's live fetchers, Perplexity's crawlers and Google-Extended are all disallowed in its robots.txt.
Is Substack good for AI discoverability?
Yes, with conditions. Substack's pages are open to all the main AI crawlers, and posts are plain, readable text with clear titles and dates. A publication on a custom domain, such as newsletter.yourcompany.com, builds recognition for your own brand rather than for Substack. Writers can switch on a setting telling AI tools not to train on their content. That blocks training crawlers without affecting ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Google Search, but it also blocks Google-Extended, so posts can drop out of the Gemini app's web-grounded answers.
Substack works best when:
- You publish a genuine newsletter with a regular audience, where subscribers are the main goal and AI discoverability is a bonus.
- Each post answers a clear question or makes a specific argument, with the answer near the top.
- The author is named, with a short bio naming the company and what it does.
- Key posts are also on your website, or the newsletter lives on your own domain.
It is less suited to reference content such as pricing, documentation or product facts, which belong on your site.
Can Medium help a brand get recognized by LLMs?
It can help modestly. Medium allows AI search crawlers and live fetchers, so its posts can be retrieved and cited. It blocks OpenAI's and Anthropic's training crawlers. Medium's import tool adds your original post as the canonical link. So you can republish without competing with your own site in Google.
Where it helps:
- Reaching Medium's readers in technology, product, design and writing topics.
- Building a named author's record on a topic, which supports recognition of the person and, through their bio, the company.
- Publications with an audience, where an accepted piece reaches more readers than a personal account.
Where it helps less:
- Member-only stories may show crawlers and readers only part of the text.
- Brand accounts posting promotional material add little evidence. Medium's value comes from authors with genuine expertise.
Should the content live on your own site first?
Usually, yes:
- Your site is readable by every AI system you allow, with no platform rules in between.
- It keeps facts in one place you control and can update.
- It connects content to your product, pricing and proof pages.
- Platforms change their rules. Crawler policies, paywalls and features shift over time.
A workable pattern:
- Publish the full piece on your site with the answer first and your evidence.
- On LinkedIn, post a native summary or article adapted to that audience, with the key point and a link.
- On Medium, import the post so the canonical link points to your site, or write a companion piece.
- On Substack, send it to subscribers, ideally from a publication on your own domain.
Duplicate full copies without a canonical link can compete with your own page in search. Adapting rather than copying avoids that and suits each audience better.
How should AEO content be written on these platforms?
- Lead with the answer to a specific question in the first two sentences.
- Name the author, role and company in the bio and, where natural, in the text.
- Include specifics: numbers, examples, named tools, dates.
- Use descriptive titles phrased the way people ask.
- Link to the canonical source on your site for details, data and proof.
- Keep bios consistent across all three platforms and your site.
How do you measure which platform works?
Run the questions each piece targets in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google, and record which version is cited, if any. Track referral visits from each platform to your site and what those visitors do. Watch engagement on the platform itself, since audience response often predicts later citations. After three months, put more effort into the platform that is both cited and read.
What might an illustrative case look like?
Consider an illustrative head of finance operations at a payments startup who wrote about month-end close. Full guides went on the company blog. Each became a LinkedIn article with the main point and a link, and a Medium import with the blog as canonical. After four months, ChatGPT answers on month-end close cited two of the LinkedIn articles and one blog guide, naming the author and company. Perplexity cited the blog guide and a Medium import, never the LinkedIn versions. The team kept publishing on the blog first and adapted each piece for LinkedIn. It dropped Medium for topics its readers did not follow there.
What do people ask about publishing platforms and AI?
Should we move our blog to Substack or Medium?
Rarely. Use them for reach and keep the canonical version on your own site.
Do LinkedIn company page posts get cited as much as personal posts?
Personal posts from named experts tend to carry more weight. Company posts are useful for announcements and facts.
Does blocking AI training on Substack hurt visibility?
Mostly no. The setting blocks training crawlers such as GPTBot and ClaudeBot, which does not affect ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity search answers or Google Search. But it also blocks Google-Extended, which Google uses for grounding answers in the Gemini app, so your posts can drop out of Gemini's web-grounded answers.
Can we republish the same article on all three?
You can, but adapt it for each audience, and use Medium's import tool so your site stays canonical.
Published by The Kovmere Team · updated Sep 29, 2026 · More resources