Am I on AI Review: Visibility Tracking, Competitor Insights, and Recommendations
Am I on AI tracks how often ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews mention your brand. It shows which sources they cite and how you compare with competitors, then turns that into weekly action plans. Pro costs $100 a month for up to 150 prompts. Prism, at $349, tracks five audience segments and 750 prompts. A done-with-you service, GEO Council, costs $2,500 a month and is currently waitlisted. The tool is simple and action-focused, and its free audit is a quick way to see where you stand. It covers only two AI surfaces, though. Many of its suggested actions involve posting in online communities, which needs care. It suits small marketing teams that want a to-do list more than a data platform.
What are the plans?
As listed on Am I on AI's pricing page:
| Plan | Price | Prompts | AI surfaces | What else |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | $100/mo | Up to 150 | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews | Full citation data, personalised recommendations, content pillar tracking |
| Prism | $349/mo | Up to 750 across 5 audience segments | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews | Separate citations and action plan per segment |
| GEO Council | $2,500/mo | Custom | Custom | Expert-led plan, monthly calls, quarterly board snapshot; waitlist |
Both self-serve plans start with a seven-day free trial with no commitment. There is also an agency programme with white-label, multi-client dashboards, and an API for pulling visibility data into your own reports.
What does it track?
- Prompt mentions: whether and how often you appear for tracked prompts, with a grade from A to F.
- Sources: the domains AI answers cite most in your category, and how their influence changes.
- Competitors: how your visibility compares with rivals on the same prompts.
- Sentiment and growth: tone of mentions and week-by-week trends.
- Content pillars: visibility grouped by the themes you care about.
The site describes weekly tracking, weekly reports and weekly action plans. It also publishes category leaderboards, showing which brands lead AI answers for topics such as CRM software or VPN services, and offers international tracking with localised queries.
Some third-party reviews describe different engines, prompt limits or trial lengths. Those appear to reflect earlier plans, so check the current pricing page before comparing.
How good are its competitor insights?
Useful for a first view. Seeing which brands win the prompts you lose, and which domains AI answers cite for them, points directly at where to focus. Prism's audience segments add something many entry-level tools lack: a way to check whether answers change for different kinds of buyer, such as a founder versus an IT manager. The limit is coverage. With only ChatGPT and Google's AI Overviews, you will not see how Perplexity, Gemini, Claude or Copilot treat you.
When are audience segments worth paying for?
Prism's five segments make sense when different buyers ask different questions. A payroll product, for example, may be researched by a founder asking about cost, an accountant asking about compliance and an operations manager asking about integrations. Each group's prompts can produce different winners and cite different sources, and a single blended score hides that. If your buyers are one group asking similar questions, Pro's 150 prompts are enough, and the extra $249 a month is better spent on the work itself. A quick test: write ten questions for each buyer type and ask them by hand. If the answers name different competitors, segments will add insight.
How good are the recommendations?
This is Am I on AI's main selling point. It says recommendations are generated from your own ChatGPT response data, and it shows which completed actions coincided with visibility gains. The examples on its homepage fall into three groups:
- Community engagement: replying to discussion threads that AI answers cite.
- Publishing on trusted platforms: articles on professional networks and developer or writing sites.
- Owned content: comparison posts and site structure changes.
Tying actions to specific prompts and sources is better than a generic checklist. Two cautions apply. First, community posting must be open and genuinely helpful: most communities ban undisclosed promotion, and moderators and users punish it, which can create exactly the negative sources you want to avoid. Second, a visibility gain after an action is not proof the action caused it, since AI answers vary from week to week. Track actions and results over several weeks before drawing conclusions. How to earn third-party mentions honestly is covered in how to get your brand added to listicles AI cites.
What does it cost per answer?
If prompts run weekly on both surfaces, Pro's 150 prompts give about 1,300 answers a month, roughly 8 cents each, or about 67 cents per prompt. That is dearer per answer than trackers that run daily, but the price includes recommendations. Prism works out at about 47 cents per prompt. For comparison with other trackers at this level, see the SE Ranking AI visibility tracker and Profound vs Peec vs Otterly.
Where does it fall short?
- Two AI surfaces. ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews only.
- Weekly data. Enough for trends, too slow for launches or reputation incidents.
- No traffic link. It does not connect mentions to AI referral visits or conversions; use your analytics for that.
- Heavy reliance on community tactics in its suggested actions.
We have not tested Am I on AI ourselves; this review is based on its published pages.
Who is it for?
- Good fit: small marketing teams and founders who want a clear weekly to-do list for ChatGPT and Google's AI answers.
- Reasonable fit: agencies wanting a simple, white-label client report.
- Poor fit: teams that need many engines, daily data or links to revenue.
How should you trial it?
- Run the free audit on ChatGPT and on AI Overviews to see your starting grade.
- In the seven-day trial, add 30 prompts you already check by hand, and compare results.
- Review the first action plan and mark which items are specific, honest and doable.
- Check the cited sources against what you know about your market.
- Decide on cadence: if weekly data is enough, the price is fair for the guidance.
What might this look like in practice?
Consider an illustrative accounting software start-up, Tallyhook, with a two-person marketing team. The free audit graded it D on ChatGPT. On Pro, the first action plans pointed to two comparison articles that ChatGPT cited for competitors, and to a developer forum where its integration was often discussed. The team asked both article authors to review its product, and had its lead engineer answer forum questions under their own name, stating where they worked. Over ten weeks, its grade rose to C, and the team kept a log of actions and dates to judge which ones mattered.
What do people ask about Am I on AI?
Which AI platforms does Am I on AI track?
ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews, on both self-serve plans.
Is there a free version?
There is a free AI visibility audit and a seven-day free trial.
How often does it update?
Its site describes weekly tracking, reports and action plans.
Does it have an API?
Yes. It offers an API for pulling visibility data into your own dashboards.
Published by The Kovmere Team · updated Sep 29, 2026 · More resources