Scrunch Alternatives for Agencies Needing Client-Ready Evidence of AI Recommendations
Scrunch's Agency Core plan costs $500 a month for three client brand workspaces, with access controls; its quoted Agency Enterprise tier adds an API-first setup that lets agencies present white-label outputs in their own interface. Agencies that need evidence a client can read and trust, such as full answers, cited pages, repeated runs and a branded report, can also compare Peec AI's agency plans, PromptWatch's agency tier, Profound at $399 per client workspace, AthenaHQ's agency programme, Rankscale Growth, Otterly, Goodie's pitch workspaces and Kovmere, which is our product. The right choice depends on whether clients log in, read a report, or hear the findings in a meeting.
What makes AI visibility evidence client-ready?
A chart going up is not evidence a client can check. Client-ready evidence lets a non-specialist see what happened and why it matters:
- The question asked, word for word, so the client recognises it as something their buyers would ask.
- The answer itself, or a quoted excerpt, with the engine, date and settings.
- Who was named instead, so the competitive point is concrete.
- The pages cited, so the client sees which sources shape the answer.
- More than one run, so a single unusual answer is not presented as the norm.
- The same questions over time, so before-and-after comparisons are fair.
- A next step tied to the finding, not a generic recommendation.
- The agency's branding, with no vendor name, if the client is paying the agency.
What does Scrunch offer agencies?
Scrunch's agency offer includes multi-client workspaces, access controls, an API-first headless setup with white-label outputs and a referral commission of up to 20%. Its partner programme has been described as including prospecting licences and co-marketing funds. Its brand Core plan, at $250, covers 125 prompts and 5,000 responses a month on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot for one country, with site audits; Enterprise adds nine engines and an agent-facing version of the client's site.
How do the alternatives compare?
| Tool | Client-facing format | Evidence depth | Agency pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scrunch | Client workspaces on Agency Core; white-label outputs through its API on Agency Enterprise | Monitoring, site audits, limited query fan-out on Core | Agency Core $500 a month |
| Peec AI | Client users, view-only dashboards, report templates per client, white label | Daily tracking, source gaps by domain and URL | About $245 a month for Essential; Growth $495 for 3 to 10 clients |
| PromptWatch | White-label client portal, Data Studio connector | Answers captured from engine interfaces, fan-out queries | Agency tier by demo |
| Profound | Agency workspaces, five agency seats | 100 prompts per client on ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews, daily | $99 a month plus $399 per client |
| AthenaHQ | Pitch-ready workspaces, discounted licences for resale | Eleven models on Starter | Agency bands by quote; Starter $295 |
| Rankscale Growth | White-label reports, 50 brand dashboards, REST API | 17+ engines on credits | $385 a month |
| Otterly | Unlimited workspaces and brand reports from Standard | Daily tracking on four engines, page audits | Standard $189 a month |
| Goodie Agency Growth | Ten pitch workspaces a month, client workspaces as an add-on | Daily tracking; its Core brand plan covers five models | $275 a month |
| Kovmere Agency Portfolio (ours) | White-label PDF reports and client share links; five seats | Up to 18 buyer questions and 2 brand checks per site, three runs each on five engines, full answers and cited pages, drafted fixes | $129 a month for three sites, $39 each extra |
Which alternative fits which agency?
Clients log in and expect a dashboard: Peec AI's agency plans or PromptWatch's portal.
You pitch a lot of new business: Goodie's pitch workspaces, AthenaHQ's pitch-ready workspaces or Peec's free pitch projects.
Clients are enterprise brands that expect a recognised name: Profound, at a higher cost per client.
You manage many brands on shared credits with an API: Rankscale Growth.
You want a low-cost multi-client start: Otterly Standard.
Clients read a monthly report and want to know what to do: Kovmere's Agency Portfolio. Each client site gets a full Pro: a frozen set of up to 20 buyer questions read three times on OpenAI, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews each billing period, weekly pulses on the same questions, the answers and cited pages readable, and up to 12 drafted fixes per period with every fact traced to the client's own site. You send a white-label PDF or a share link. Two prospect snapshots a month support pitching.
What does client-ready evidence cost for five clients?
- Peec AI Growth: $495 a month for three to ten clients.
- Scrunch: Agency Core, at $500 a month or $417 billed yearly, includes three client brand workspaces; for five clients, ask Scrunch for a quote.
- Profound: $99 plus five clients at $399, $2,094 a month.
- Otterly Standard: $189 a month, if 100 prompts cover five clients.
- Kovmere Agency Portfolio: $129 plus two extra sites at $39, $207 a month.
The cheapest plan is not the one that renews best; the one whose report the client reads and acts on usually does.
How should you present the evidence?
Lead with two or three answers the client will recognise, quoted with the engine and date. Show who was named instead and the page cited. State how many runs sit behind each figure and that results are samples, not every buyer's conversation. Tie each recommendation to one of those answers. Keep the same questions month to month, and when they change, say so. Our page on what an agency white-label report should disclose covers the disclosure details.
What might client-ready evidence look like?
Take an illustrative agency reporting to a regional HVAC company. The monthly report opens with the question "best HVAC company for heat pump installation in Columbus", the answers from three engines naming two competitors, and the pages cited: a local review site and one competitor's heat pump page listing rebates and brands installed. Across three runs, the client appeared once on one engine. The recommendation follows directly: a heat pump page stating the brands installed, the rebate help offered and the areas served, drafted from the client's existing service pages for approval. The next report shows the same question again.
What are Kovmere's limits for agencies?
Kovmere offers branded PDFs and share links, not a client login portal, custom domain or API. Each client site is measured for one US market with up to 20 questions, through engine APIs rather than consumer apps, without AI Mode or Copilot, and self-serve covers three to nine sites. Agencies should never promise clients a citation or recommendation, whichever tool supplies the evidence.
For more agency comparisons, see the best AI visibility tool for agencies: Peec AI, Scrunch or Profound.
What do people ask about Scrunch alternatives for agencies?
Does Scrunch offer white label?
Its Agency Enterprise tier is API-first with white-label outputs, so you can present data in your own interface; Agency Core gives client workspaces.
Which alternative is cheapest per client?
Kovmere's Agency Portfolio and Otterly Standard are among the lowest per client at five clients; compare what each client receives.
Which alternative has a client portal?
PromptWatch's agency tier and Peec AI's client users give clients their own view.
What should every client report include?
The question, the answer excerpt, who was named, the cited pages, the number of runs and one action tied to the finding.
Published by The Kovmere Team · updated Oct 3, 2026 · More resources