Frase.io Review for AI SEO and GEO Tracking
Frase is now a content platform that audits, researches, writes, publishes and hosts pages, with AI visibility tracking built in. Starter costs $39 a month billed yearly, or $49 monthly, and tracks 50 prompts daily on ChatGPT and Google AI. Professional adds Perplexity and AI crawler monitoring, and Scale adds Claude and Gemini with 500 prompts. The tracking is useful but light: it tells you whether AI engines cite your pages, and Frase says plainly that its AI Visibility feature does not fix anything on its own. The value lies in the content loop around it. Frase suits small teams whose main job is producing and refreshing content, not teams that need deep AI visibility analysis.
What does Frase do now?
Frase describes itself as a content operating system for AI search. As listed on its site and pricing page, the loop runs like this:
- Listen: Frase Answers, a chat widget on your site, captures the questions visitors ask. Every plan includes a free tier.
- Audit: it scores existing pages for search and AI readiness, and ranks fixes by likely value.
- Plan and write: an opportunity report combines Search Console data, competitor gaps, decaying pages and visitor questions, then drafts content in your brand voice.
- Publish: it pushes posts to WordPress, Webflow, Sanity or Wix, or hosts them on FraseCMS, which is free up to 100,000 page views a month.
- Monitor and fix: Content Guard watches Google rankings and traffic on chosen pages and drafts a revision when one slips. AI Visibility tracks citations in AI answers daily.
An agent can run parts of this loop overnight and, if you allow it, publish without asking. Frase also exposes its tools through an MCP server and command-line tool, so you can drive it from assistants such as Claude or ChatGPT.
What does the AI visibility tracking cover?
| Plan | Price (yearly / monthly) | AI engines | Prompts tracked | Other AI features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $39 / $49 | ChatGPT, Google AI | 50 | SEO and GEO scores |
| Professional | $103 / $129 | + Perplexity | 200 | AI crawler monitoring |
| Scale | $239 / $299 | + Claude, Gemini | 500 | Client-ready reports |
| Enterprise | Custom | All named engines | Custom | White-label, SSO |
Monitoring runs daily, with alerts. Frase reports which of your pages AI tools name as sources and your share of voice across the tracked engines. Extra prompts can be added as you go on paid plans.
How good is the tracking?
It answers the basic question, whether AI engines cite you for the prompts you care about, at a low price. If each prompt runs once a day on each engine, Starter's 50 prompts on two engines give about 3,000 answers a month, well under two cents each, with the content tools included. The limits:
- Few engines at entry. Starter covers only ChatGPT and Google's AI. Claude and Gemini need the $239 Scale plan.
- Page-level focus. It tracks which of your pages are cited. Dedicated trackers show more about the third-party sources that decide answers, and how competitors are described.
- Proprietary scores. The GEO and AI-readiness scores are Frase's own measures. Frase does not publish evidence that a higher score predicts more citations, so treat them as checklists.
- No automatic fixes. Frase says AI Visibility does not auto-fix. It flags gaps; the writing loop is how you act on them.
For comparison with dedicated trackers, see AthenaHQ vs Frase vs AIclicks, which prices the same tracking job across all three.
What is it good for?
- Content decay. Content Guard catches pages losing Google rankings and drafts updates, which suits sites with large back catalogues.
- Finding topics from real questions. Frase Answers turns visitor questions into topics, a source of demand keyword tools miss.
- Small teams. One seat on Starter covers audit, writing, publishing and tracking for a single site.
- Connecting work to results. Tracking sits beside the content you publish, so you can see whether new or updated pages start to be cited.
What should you watch out for?
The biggest risk is automation. Frase's agent can publish on its own, on any content type, whenever you switch that on. Large volumes of lightly edited AI text can breach Google's policy on scaled content abuse, and rarely add the original information that earns citations in AI answers. Keep publishing on review for anything that states facts, prices or advice, and add first-hand detail to drafts.
Also check limits before choosing a plan. Starter includes 10 articles and 50 audit pages a month, and holds at those limits rather than charging extra. Professional and Scale offer optional pay-as-you-go, off by default. Frase is candid that no tool will lift rankings or citations within a seven-day trial; results build over weeks.
Who should skip it?
Frase is a poor fit for three kinds of team. Enterprises that need many engines, markets and prompts will outgrow its tracking quickly. Teams whose visibility depends mainly on third-party sources, such as review sites and trade press, need source analysis and outreach tools more than a writer. And sites where every page needs expert or legal review gain little from drafting speed, since review time sets the pace.
How does it compare with Surfer?
Surfer is the closest rival: both combine content optimisation with AI tracking. Surfer's strength is its Content Editor, which scores drafts against top-ranking pages; its AI Tracker starts at 25 prompts weekly on ChatGPT in the $99 Standard plan. Frase tracks more prompts daily at a lower entry price, and covers more of the loop, including publishing, hosting and decay monitoring. Surfer is covered in the Surfer SEO review. For tracking-first tools priced for small teams, see the SE Ranking AI visibility tracker and the AICarma review.
How should you trial it?
The trial lasts seven days with no card. Use it to test the parts you can judge in a week:
- Run the audit on your site and check whether its top fixes match what you already know.
- Add 20 real prompts to AI Visibility, and compare the first results with what you see when you ask ChatGPT yourself.
- Draft one page from the opportunity report, and time how long it takes to make it publishable.
- Connect Search Console and see whether Content Guard flags pages you know are slipping.
- Leave auto-publishing off during the trial.
What might this look like in practice?
Consider an illustrative accounting software blog, Wembstead, with 400 old posts and one content marketer. Frase's audit flagged 60 posts whose answers were buried deep in the text, and Content Guard found a dozen losing rankings. AI Visibility showed the blog cited in ChatGPT for a few basic bookkeeping prompts but absent from Google's AI answers. The marketer refreshed the dozen slipping posts first, rewrote the openings of the 60, and used visitor questions from Frase Answers to plan four new guides. Each draft was edited by hand before publishing, and citations were checked monthly rather than daily.
What do people ask about Frase?
Does Frase track AI Overviews?
Yes. Every plan tracks ChatGPT and Google's AI answers; higher plans add Perplexity, Claude and Gemini.
Can Frase fix my AI visibility automatically?
No. Frase says AI Visibility monitors and alerts but does not auto-fix. Its writing tools help you act.
Is Frase a replacement for a dedicated AI tracker?
For basic citation tracking, often yes. For source analysis and competitor narratives, a dedicated tracker goes further.
Is there a free plan?
No, but there is a seven-day free trial, and FraseCMS hosting is free up to 100,000 page views a month.
Published by The Kovmere Team · updated Sep 29, 2026 · More resources